What a US Bill About Robotaxis Teaches Malaysian Business Owners About Risk
If you run an SME in Malaysia, a story about a proposed law in New Jersey might seem irrelevant. But look closer: the debate over whether a robotaxi can rely solely on cameras—and the legal pushback against that choice—holds a powerful lesson about depending on a single approach when the stakes are high. That lesson applies directly to how you automate your business, choose technology partners, and plan for growth.
TL;DR: New Jersey lawmakers are advancing a bill that would require driverless commercial vehicles to have cameras plus two additional sensor types (like radar and lidar). Tesla’s camera-only Robotaxi can’t meet that requirement, effectively banning it from the state. The move highlights the risks of betting everything on one technology—a mistake SME owners also make when they rely on a single software tool or vendor without a backup plan. (Source)
The Bill That Puts Tesla in a Corner
New Jersey’s proposed law, S1677, would set up a three-year pilot for fully driverless commercial vehicles. The catch: each vehicle must be equipped with cameras plus at least two other sensing technologies—in practice, radar and lidar. This directly targets Tesla’s strategy, which relies on cameras alone for its planned Robotaxi network. The bill also requires 50,000 miles of supervised testing with a human safety driver before going driverless, plus reporting every crash to the state. (Source)
Even the vehicle design is at risk: Tesla’s Cybercab has no steering wheel or pedals, while the bill favors retaining traditional controls. And neighboring New York is considering a similar hardware mandate. (Source)
Why Multiple Sensor Types Matter
The bill doesn’t target any single company—its sponsor, Senator Andrew Zwicker, said it’s about safety. The idea is redundancy: if one sensor type fails (e.g., cameras blinded by glare or heavy rain), others can still detect obstacles. Radar cuts through fog, lidar builds precise 3D maps regardless of lighting. Waymo, Zoox, and most other autonomous vehicle operators already use all three. (Source)
“Camera-only tech simply isn’t ready for around-the-clock public-road use in tough climates.” — Carnegie Mellon engineering professor Philip Koopman (Source)
The Data Gap: Waymo vs. Tesla
The numbers tell a story. Waymo operates more than 3,500 driverless vehicles across 11 US metro areas. Tesla, by contrast, still has only a handful of unsupervised test vehicles on public roads, mainly in Texas—despite Elon Musk promising hundreds of thousands of autonomous Teslas by end of 2026. (Source)
| Metric | Waymo | Tesla |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor approach | Cameras + lidar + radar | Cameras only |
| Driverless fleet size | 3,500+ (across 11 metro areas) | Handful of test vehicles |
| Regulatory status | Approved in multiple states | Facing potential bans in NJ and NY |
What This Means for Your Malaysian SME
This isn’t about cars—it’s about strategy. Here are three takeaways you can apply to your business:
- Don’t rely on a single technology or vendor. If your entire operation depends on one software tool that fails or gets blocked by regulation, you have no fallback. Diversify your tech stack.
- Build redundancy into critical processes. Just as autonomous vehicles need multiple sensor types, your business systems should have backup options—whether it’s payment gateways, communication channels, or data storage.
- Watch for regulatory shifts that could impact your tools. What works today might not work tomorrow if laws change. Stay informed and stay flexible.
Tesla’s lobbying against the bill backfired when it caused confusion among owners, but the core issue remains: a company bet on one approach and now faces a wall. Don’t let that be you. (Source)
The Bigger Picture: Redundancy as a Principle
This story is about more than robotaxis. It’s about the principle of building systems that can handle failure. In engineering, redundancy is standard. In business, it’s often overlooked. Whether you’re automating marketing, inventory, or customer service, asking “what if this one tool fails?” should be part of your planning. Regulators might force it, or market conditions might. Either way, having a plan B isn’t optional—it’s survival.
So next time you choose a software or a platform, think about the sensors. Not literally, but in terms of what happens when your primary option hits a limit.
Ready to Build a Resilient Business?
Book a free 15-min call to see how redundancy and smart automation apply to your business.
Thinking about a Tesla? Use this referral to get yourself a little bonus off your purchase → Start here.